Tracking the Endocardial Border in Artifact-Prone 3D Images

Echocardiography is a commonly-used, safe, and noninvasive method for assessing cardiac dysfunction and related coronary artery disease. The analysis of echocardiograms, whether visual or automated, has traditionally been hampered by the presence of ultrasound artifacts, which obscure the moving myocardial wall. In this study, a novel method is proposed for tracking the endocardial surface in 3D ultrasound images. Artifacts which obscure the myocardium are detected in order to improve the quality of cardiac boundary segmentation. The expectation-maximization algorithm is applied in a stationary and dynamic, cardiac-motion frame-of-reference, and weights are derived accordingly. The weights are integrated with an optical-flow based contour tracking method, which incorporates prior knowledge via a statistical model of cardiac motion. Evaluation on 35 three-dimensional echocardiographic sequences shows that this weighed tracking method significantly improves the tracking results. In conclusion, the proposed weights are able to reduce the influence of artifacts, resulting in a more accurate quantitative analysis

Left Ventricular Border Tracking Using Cardiac Motion Models and Optical Flow

The use of automated methods is becoming increasingly important for assessing cardiac function quantitatively and objectively. In this study, we propose a method for tracking three-dimensional (3-D) left ventricular contours. The method consists of a local optical flow tracker and a global tracker, which uses a statistical model of cardiac motion in an optical-flow formulation. We propose a combination of local and global trackers using gradient-based weights. The algorithm was tested on 35 echocardiographic sequences, with good results (surface error: 1.35 ± 0.46 mm, absolute volume error: 5.4 ± 4.8 mL). This demonstrates the method’s potential in automated tracking in clinical quality echocardiograms, facilitating the quantitative and objective assessment of cardiac functio

Sparse registration for three-dimensional stress echocardiography

Three-dimensional (3-D) stress echocardiography is a novel technique for diagnosing cardiac dysfunction. It involves evaluating wall motion of the left ventricle, by visually analyzing ultrasound images obtained in rest and in different stages of stress. Since the acquisitions are performed minutes apart, variabilities may exist in the visualized cross-sections. To improve anatomical correspondence between rest and stress, aligning the images is essential. We developed a new intensity-based, sparse registration method to retrieve standard anatomical views from 3-D stress images that were equivalent to the manually selected views in the rest images. Using sparse image planes, the influence of common image artifacts could be reduced. We investigated different similarity measures and different levels of sparsity. The registration was tested using data of 20 patients and quantitatively evaluated based on manually defined anatomical landmarks. Alignment was best using sparse registration with two long-axis and two short-axis views; registration errors were reduced significantly, to the range of interobserver variabilities. In 91% of the cases, the registration result was qualitatively assessed as better than or equal to the manual alignment. In conclusion, sparse registration improves the alignment of rest and stress images, with a performance similar to manual alignment. This is an important step towards objective quantification in 3-D stress echocardiography

Registration of 2D cardiac images to real-time 3D ultrasound volumes for 3D stress echocardiography

Three-dimensional (3D) stress echocardiography is a novel technique for diagnosing cardiac dysfunction, by comparing wall motion of the left ventricle under different stages of stress. For quantitative comparison of this motion, it is essential to register the ultrasound data. We propose an intensity based rigid registration method to retrieve two-dimensional (2D) four-chamber (4C), two-chamber, and short-axis planes from the 3D data set acquired in the stress stage, using manually selected 2D planes in the rest stage as reference. The algorithm uses the Nelder-Mead simplex optimization to find the optimal transformation of one uniform scaling, three rotation, and three translation parameters. We compared registration using the SAD, SSD, and NCC metrics, performed on four resolution levels of a Gaussian pyramid. The registration's effectiveness was assessed by comparing the 3D positions of the registered apex and mitral valve midpoints and 4C direction with the manually selected results. The registration was tested on data from 20 patients. Best results were found using the NCC metric on data downsampled with factor two: mean registration errors were 8.1mm, 5.4mm, and 8.0° in the apex position, mitral valve position, and 4C direction respectively. The errors were close to the interobserver (7.1mm, 3.8mm, 7.4°) and intraobserver variability (5.2mm, 3.3mm, 7.0°), and better than the error before registration (9.4mm, 9.0mm, 9.9°). We demonstrated that the registration algorithm visually and quantitatively improves the alignment of rest and stress data sets, performing similar to manual alignment. This will improve automated analysis in 3D stress echocardiography